For Payers
Whole person care management
Leverage a world-class clinical team using evidence-based, integrated, med-psych, and behavior change models to ensure a healthy lifestyle for members and patients.
Traditional approach versus the Sagility whole-person approach
We are more than our medical diagnoses
People are important authorities on their own health
We all create narratives for understanding our life and health
Health improvement is a collaborative enterprise
We experience our health and wellbeing challenges every day
Traditional care management
Identification
Heuristic and algorithm based mostly on recent utilization; prone to false echoes
Engagement
Reliance on low-touch, low-reach methods; mostly telephonic and digital
Intervention – Thesis
Medical orientation addresses only 30% of drivers of outcomes; “nag therapy” is not relevant to member’s needs; all members treated similarly
Intervention – Objectives
Focus on health plan goals specific to the medical diagnoses and/or to the care gap
Integration
Typical case and disease management programs are siloed from ecosystem
Sagility whole-person care
Identification
Sagility Impactability Index™ based on drivers of future risk without overreliance on past costs
Engagement
Utilizes standard practices like text/mail; add telehealth, in-person, local outreach, RPM
Intervention – Thesis
Address needs of the ‘whole person’ including all drivers of outcomes; relationship with member matters; members are unique, and multi-chronics have unique needs
Intervention – Objectives
Focus on member goals and on self-efficacy; prioritizes the member’s identified barriers
Integration
Prioritizes inclusion of providers and use of community/social services
Related whole-person care case studies
Healthcare LLC, doing business as Sagility™). All rights reserved.